Religion,
for all of its flaws, does have some beneficial side effects. I won’t
deny that, as that would be extremely hypocritical of me since my entire
motivation here is to advance truth and reality, and there really are
some good things that can be derived from religion. It provides comfort
in the face of death if you believe you’ll go to heaven (and it allows
those left behind a measure of peace if they think you went to heaven).
It can make you feel special if you think a supernatural being is
listening to your prayers and watching over you. Churches provide a
sense of community and belonging, and serve as a weekly excuse for a
social gathering. Religion can also be used as a means of getting
children to behave--if you can get your kids to believe that there is an
invisible man watching their every move,
and then get them to believe that he gets mad when they do “bad” things
and might go so far as to send them to Hell for eternity if they
misbehave too much...it seems like that should do a reasonable job of
convincing them to be good kids.
However, none of these are legitimate reasons to continue being religious. Believing
that people go to heaven after they die doesn’t mean that they do,
regardless of how much comfort that provides. It would make me happier
if I believed
that I was going to win the lottery or marry Mila Kunis, but that
doesn’t change the fact that neither of those things are actually going
to happen. Just as believing I was going to win the lottery would have a
detrimental effect on my career as I would likely stop caring about my
job, believing in heaven can cause people to take their earthly lives
less seriously (which, obviously, would be a terrible mistake).
Believing in the power of prayer to change your life is just as bad, as
relying on mythical beings to fix your problems instead of doing it
yourself has a terrible track record. Inspiration is all well and good;
reliance is not.
What
about the “benefits” that don’t have negative side effects? There’s
nothing wrong with feeling connected to other members of a church and
sharing experiences with them and making friends. In fact, I think this
is one of the reasons that religion still exists as it’s one of the
few tangible benefits people get from believing in a god: the fellowship
of other believers. If you’re afraid of losing that sense of community
if you lose your religion, why not find a different community to be a
part of that isn’t based on irrational belief and behavior? Join a book
club. Join a sports league. Have a weekly movie night with friends. Go
to meetup.com and find literally anything that interests you. Even if you decide that you want to join a Twilight
fan club, at least you’ll be conscious of the fact that what you read
is fictional. Plus, you still get to lionize a mythical character with
some cool powers. Just call him Edward instead of Allah.
What
about raising kids as Christians to gain the behavioral benefits? I
humbly submit a secular solution to that, too. Many adults
wholeheartedly believe in God, which leads to some confusion about
whether or not kids should believe in God when they get older. Plus,
using God requires wasting countless Sunday mornings if you’re going to
throw yourself into the whole religion thing (not to mention all the pesky praying and tithing and guilt). What if we could all use a
previously agreed-upon fictional character that watches over kids with
the same punishment/reward system for behavior? Why not use Santa
instead of God?
Santa
Claus is really just a nicer version of God. We imagine them both to be
nice old men with flowing white beards. People care about them the most
during December, and even go so far as to sing special songs for them.
Both have supernatural powers, like causing worldwide floods or eating
millions of cookies in a single evening. They both promise to reward us if
we’re good. As such, the consequences of ticking them off are used by
parents in an attempt to get kids to behave. We learn about them both
from our parents rather than in school. Those of us who operate
logically grow up and figure out that, even though our parents told us they were real, we should stop believing in them and letting them
determine our actions because they do not exist.
Some people figure out sooner than others that Santa doesn't exist, just like some people figure out sooner than others that God doesn't exist. OK, so technically I don't know that God doesn't exist...but I don't know that Santa doesn't exist, either. There is no incontrovertible
evidence that Santa is a myth. I can stay up all night
by the Christmas tree and confirm that a jolly fat man never leaves any
presents there. I could set up a hidden camera to film my living room
every night of the year while I sleep just to make sure that I have no
surprise visitors from the chimney. This would not prove that he hadn’t
visited other houses overnight; maybe he neglected mine because I was on
the naughty list. Or maybe he retired because there’s too damn many
people on this planet for him to deal with. I don’t know for sure,
although at this point it seems safe to say, with greater than 99%
confidence, that there does not exist a jolly old fat man with a long
white beard who dresses in red velvet and flies around in a sleigh
pulled by flying reindeer at supersonic speeds once a year to deposit
presents and fill stockings and eat cookies that may have been left
lying around for him with an uncanny ability to determine the desires of
each person he bestows presents upon. But again, he could just be
retired.
So do I have proof that he does not exist? No, I don’t, just like I don’t have proof
that God does not exist. Although at this point it seems safe to say,
with greater than 99% confidence, that there does not exist a kind old man with a
long white beard who lives in the heavens (but also has an invisible
branch of Himself that is omnipresent on Earth) who created the Earth
yet refuses to prove it and designed men and women and all creatures on
Earth (including the extinct creatures who roamed the Earth far longer
than 6,000 years ago even though that's when He created it) and got mad at all the people He created and so decided to kill all
the ones who did not build a giant boat and allowed the one guy who did
to live for 900 years and proceeded to have a love/hate,
on-again-off-again relationship with all of humanity for a few thousand
years before he got tired of being a vengeful God and decided to have
supernatural sex with a random broad so she could bear His son whom He
would summarily kill about 30 years later to atone for all of the sins that had ever occurred or would occur by invoking the law of the
universe that states “if you’re a deity you can wipe out all the
misdeeds of an entire race by killing your own son as long as you
proceed to resurrect him three days later.” Also, He seems to like to
put people who fuck little kids in positions of high esteem within His
church. And I think he let a guy live inside a fish for a few days for
some reason.
So, no, I can’t prove that this supernatural being doesn’t
exist (although it is equally impossible for anyone but Him to prove
that he does (which He oh so conveniently refuses to do)), so that is
what atheists mean when they say that they’re technically agnostics. I
don’t believe that God exists anymore than I believe that Santa exists,
but since there is no proof of His non-existence that technically makes
me agnostic.
Getting
back to Santa, the world would be a much better place if he just
replaced God entirely. Kids are naturally prone to misbehave, but they
respond to rewards and punishment. That’s one of the few benefits that
God provides. If we just had a secular Christmas every other month or
so, we could do away with all this religion nonsense. Santa doesn’t
require you to worship him or his reindeer, he just requires you to be
well-behaved. Santa doesn’t encroach on your weekends (or any of your
free time, for that matter). His only restrictions for what you can and
cannot do is how it affects other people; as long as you’re not having a
detrimental effect on others, you can do whatever the hell you want as
far as Santa is concerned. You can masturbate and have sex whenever and
however and with whoever you please, given that you don’t harm anyone
else in the process. He’ll even let you be gay if you want.
The best thing about Santa? No one ever thought he wanted them to kill anyone.
No one ever started a war because they favored Santa over the Easter
Bunny. No one has ever committed jihad in order to punish those that
don’t believe in Santa. No one has ever killed others for living on a
piece of the North Pole that Santa promised them. You know what people
do in the name of Santa? Nice things.
If we’re going to believe in a fictional character to influence our
behavior, let’s at least pick a good one. I nominate Santa for the
office of God.
Hmm, where to begin?
ReplyDeleteIf there is no heaven or afterlife, how do you explain all the stories of NDEs (near death experiences)?
Do we who try to obey God really only do it b/c we're afraid of spankings?
Don't the teachings of Jesus have as much to do with life on earth as the hereafter?
Can you give some of us credit for not expecting an ancient document to be a modern textbook? Or thinking that people are responsible for the bad things they do?
If you substitute Santa for God, how long do you think it would take for soldiers to wear red uniforms?
Taking your questions point by point:
ReplyDelete-The simplest explanation for near death experiences is that the brain does not operate normally when it is deprived of oxygen (which happens when the heart stops pumping blood up there) which causes hallucinations. For people to have memories of the time while they were briefly “dead,” their brain would have to still be functioning on some level in order to store those memories, but it clearly doesn’t function at an optimal level.
-If by “spankings” you mean “Hell” then yes, absolutely. Without the idea of consequences, either here or in the afterlife, the major religions would cease to exist. The idea that people adhere to a religion for reasons other than trying to affect their own life is absurd. It’s the only way to justify all the bullshit that occurs in the name of religion--”it’s God’s will.” Why would you worship a being who is a complete jerk by today’s moral standards unless you had come to accept that they made the rules, so you have no choice but to do as they please or risk going to Hell for eternity?
-Sort of. Behavioral direction for life on earth is directly tied to their consequences in the hereafter. So, yes, Jesus was teaching about living on earth, but those teachings were tied to what God considers a “good” life worthy of entrance into Heaven.
-Sure, I’ll give you credit for not taking the Bible literally because it’s obviously full of a bunch of questionable material and the world would be full of even more senseless behavior than it already is if all Christians took the Bible literally. However, this is the only book officially licensed by the man upstairs, which should imply that 1) He approves of its contents and 2) it carries more weight than anything else in the world in regards to Christianity. You can attribute its fallibility to the fact that it was written by man, but it’s still the foundation of Christianity.
-I don’t really recommend substituting anything for God. I was just using Santa as an alternative for getting kids to behave. I do, however, find it interesting that Santa is closer to an ideal god than any of the religious gods we’ve created.
A note on the topic of NDEs. The exact same phenomena reported by the experiencers of NDEs are reported by astronauts, fighter jet pilots, scientists, etc. when they are subjected to high G forces (as in a centrifuge or hard-turning aircraft). This forces the blood and therefore oxygen supply from the brain, which, as Kyle suggests above, seems to also be the cause of NDEs.
ReplyDelete